
Our team will walk you through how leading companies run faster, fairer hiring with AI-powered interviews.
Trusted by 50+ companies · Response within 1 business day
Fill in your details and we’ll be in touch shortly.
No spam · contact@webpipl.com · Response within 1 business day
iVerified replaces your fragmented, inconsistent hiring process with a single, structured workflow. Every candidate goes through the same assessment. Every decision is backed by data. Every outcome is documented and defensible.
Admin selects template, assigns candidate & interviewer. Invite sent automatically.
AutomatedOne link. Both parties join. Video, proctoring, and recording activate instantly.
Live SessionSprint Q&A + Coding Quests. Interviewer monitors everything in real time.
Live SessionRubric scored 1–4 across 8–9 criteria. Session recorded and locked.
AI-AssistedFinal hire recommendation submitted. Full evaluation summary and audit trail ready.
Auto-GeneratedEvery step is designed to eliminate a specific failure point in traditional hiring — from scheduling bias to undocumented decisions.
An admin selects from 8 pre-built templates or generates a custom one using AI. They assign the candidate, interviewer (internal or from the external panelist pool), and set the date and time. The candidate receives a fully branded invitation email with everything they need — no follow-up required.
The candidate and interviewer join through a single link — no downloads, no plugins, no setup. The moment both parties are in the session, video conferencing, AI proctoring, and session recording activate automatically. The interviewer sees a real-time dashboard with the candidate's video, the assessment progress, and the scoring panel all in one tab.
Candidate connected · Camera and mic active
Recording in progress · 00:04:32 elapsed
1 face detected · Candidate in frame
Candidate in fullscreen · 0 exit events
1 event logged at 00:03:14 · Minor
The assessment runs in three defined phases. First, the Sprint Round — eight rapid-fire technical questions in fifteen minutes. Then, the Coding Quests — three real programming problems of increasing difficulty in a full VS Code-style editor. Finally, a review phase before submission. The interviewer watches everything in real time throughout.
8/8 questions answered · 13:42 elapsed · All answers submitted to interviewer
Quest 1 (Easy): 4/4 tests passed · Quest 2 (Medium): 2/5 tests passing · Quest 3 (Hard): Not started
Candidate reviews all answers and code before final submission
Once the candidate submits, the interviewer scores each of the 8–9 rubric criteria on a defined 1–4 scale — each score anchored to a specific description of what "Poor", "Below Average", "Good", and "Excellent" means for that criterion. The result is a score that means the same thing regardless of who did the interviewing.
The interviewer submits a final hire recommendation — from Strong Yes to Strong No — with documented strengths and concerns. iVerified automatically generates a full evaluation summary: all sprint answers, final code submissions, rubric scores, proctoring events, session recording link, and the recommendation. Every decision is auditable, shareable, and archived permanently.
Overall: 3.6/4.0 · Arjun S. recommended for hire. Evaluation summary auto-generated and ready to share.
Side by side — how iVerified compares to the unstructured interview processes most organisations are still running today.
| Capability | iVerified | Traditional Process |
|---|---|---|
| Consistency across interviewers | ||
| Objectivity of scores | ||
| Audit trail | ||
| Technical depth | ||
| Candidate integrity | ||
| Scale without headcount | ||
| ATS integration | ||
| Time-to-hire |
iVerified gives each participant exactly what they need — nothing more, nothing less — with a clear, purposeful experience at every step.
Full platform control & visibility
Conduct, monitor & evaluate
Seamless, fair, browser-based
Talk to our team and we'll walk you through every step of the iVerified process with a live demo — assessments, scoring, ATS integration, and the full evaluation summary.